HIS 104: History of Europe to the Mid-Seventeenth Century
Course Description:
This course is a survey of the development of European politics, society,
and culture through the Age of Religious Conflict. Successful completion
of this course will satisfy half of your U.K. baccalaureate degree's cross-disciplinary
requirement -- it is paired with English 261. If you take HIS 105 and ENG
262 also, then you will have completed a Humanities Cluster, which will
fulfill the Humanities and the Cross-Disciplinary Requirements at the same
time. With these courses addressing common themes and working in tandem,
you should gain an integrative perspective on modern Western Civilization.
Course Objective:
Upon completion of this course, a student should be able to:
-
read and evaluate historical resources critically.
-
demonstrate an understanding of cultural, economic, literary, political,
religious, and social values related to the period covered by this course.
Course Outline
-
Cross Disciplinary Theme I -- WAR, HEROES, AND CIVILIZATION: This
unit will focus on the shaping of the Western individual and society. We
will explore the ancients' quest for identity; explore how the individual
both shapes and is shaped by society, and discuss Greek explanations for
certain phenomena, e.g., chaos, death, injustice.
-
Ancient Origins of the Western World: Africa's Egypt & the Middle East's
Mesopotamia
-
The Hellenes
-
Alexander and the Hellenistic Era
-
Cross Disciplinary Theme II -- PAX ROMANA: LAW, TRADITION, CHANGE
AND CORRUPTION: We will examine the place of Roman ideals and ideas
in Western culture, the continuity and change that Christianity entailed,
and the falling away from or corruption of both Roman and Christian values.
-
The Roman Republic
-
The Roman Empire
-
Cross Disciplinary Theme III -- LOVE AND DEATH: The focus in
this unit will be to study the effects of great change in feudal societies,
societies which highly valued stasis in class structure and the chivalric
ideal. This change was effected by chaos (resulting from wars, plagues),
by commercialization, and by changing ideals.
-
The Byzantine Empire and Kiev
-
The Early Middle Ages
-
The High Middle Ages
-
Cross Disciplinary Theme IV -- A QUESTION OF POWER: .... who's
got it? This unit will explore early modern Europe in cultural and socio-economic
upheaval. We will question the role of the individual and the community
in establishing the modern state.
-
The Renaissance
-
The Reformation
-
Rise of the Modern State
-
Western Expansion
SAMPLE WRITING ASSIGNMENT:
Critical Biographical Review
If you've never felt secure about your research skills or typed a formal
college paper, make an appointment to see me as soon as possible to discuss
what is expected. I am more than happy to help you -- don't let me get
off too easily in this course! Keep note of the times the Writing Center
tutors are available and bring your paper in to OB228 to get help from
them, too.
ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVES:
-
To give HISTORY 104 a chance to come alive by reading about how people
lived and thought in pre-industrial Europe.
-
To research and summarize different perspectives that historians have on any one
particular historical personality (whether legendary or real) or of a historical community.
-
To write a meaningful essay that shows the amount of research and original
thought you have given this assignment, giving your own assessment of how
that person or community reflected or affected the contents of this course.
You should show at least two sides of controversy you have found in your
research.
-
To produce an impressive looking monograph of 3-5 pages with complete sentences,
correct grammar and syntax, a proper list of references, and a thoughtful
title. (You decide if it should be typed! Presentation will be graded.)
You are not being asked to write a complete history of your subject, and
you should not try. Instead, you should use your knowledge of the subject
to develop a particular theme, a main point or argument. Find out who or
what your topic is about by doing some preliminary research, and then step
back and think -- carefully and in your own way -- what is the most important
aspect you wish to explore. Then write an outline or idea-map that will
focus on your idea, leaving room for the other point of view found
in your research.
STEPS TO FOLLOW
As you skim through your text before class, try to imagine being there
or seeing a particular individual react to the problems around him or her.
Listen in class and participate by questioning or discussing issues you
about which you have read. Start to skim ahead by several chapters (or
at least look through the Table of Contents) for a topic or an individual
that catches your eye -- something about which you want to learn in more
detail. Talk with your instructor, a friend, or relative about the issues
in the book that seem interesting to you. Then, STEP 1, choose an
individual or a community of like individuals on which you want to do further
research. Think about the Unit Topic under which this individual fits chronologically
-- I recommend you try to find one of the following:
-
a hero in the Ancient World and compare/contrast your definitions
of heroism with that of the ancient civilization in which he or she was
a part.
-
a peacemaker in the Roman World who got caught in the complexities
of the great legacy of "Pax Romana."
-
a social outcast during the time of keeping to one's station in
life in the Middle Ages.
-
a humanist who worries about how to balance the need for individual
excellence with the greater development of his or her nation.
Ask a public services or reference librarian to help you determine whether
there will be adequate resources on the individual or community you have
chosen. You can use the Academic Index of "InfoTrac" as well as "NOTIS"
to get some choices of related journal articles and texts.
STEP 2 -- By the 4th week of classes, you must turn in to my
mailbox the following information:
-
The name of the individual you will be researching
-
Citations (author, title, publisher, date) of at least 3 texts and/or articles
that are available to you -- this does not include encyclopedias!
STEP 3 is to make yourself familiar with your chosen individual.
Use encyclopedias and at least one of your historical resources from the
list you turned in to me to write a one page summary of your individual's
biography -- this should be in outline form, using phrases and creative
spacing on the paper to show me that you under- stand the major themes
involved in this person's life. Turn in your one page sketch no later than
one week after your topic is chosen! This part of the assignment will be
graded on a pass/fail basis and will count as 2 points of the total 25
points of the paper.
Don't stop working on your project now! Go on to STEP 4
and learn more about the time period around your chosen excerpt and writings
on it by contemporaries as well as historians. Put the bibliographical
information on index cards with notes to yourself as to how you can use
each resource (e.g., for basic information about the individual, or for
a contrary interpretation to argue against). Bring at least three of these
cards with you to the conference with me. This step of the process will
also be graded on a pass/fail basis and will count as 3 points towards
your final grade. Your cards should include the following parts:
-
author, title (pub. place: publisher, date of pub.)
-
page # and general ideas/data you plan to use from the resource (never
use complete sentences!
STEP 5 is taking notes -- again, this historian and researcher heartily
recommends index cards! Follow up each bibliographic entry with as many
notes as you think you'll need, but try hard to remember to sprinkle page
numbers of the text through out so that you can have adequate record of
where the information comes from for your footnotes. The more notes written
in your own words, the better -- and the easier(!) -- the writing
process will be.
Write a phrase or potential paper title describing your individual to
start you off in STEP 6. Begin to sketch out your ideas (and I recommend
literally "sketching") on a big piece of paper (maybe graph paper?). Under
your descriptive phrase, write a few words under "WHO-WHERE-WHEN" "SIGNIFICANCE
TO UNIT THEME" "OTHER THEORIES" and "SO WHAT DO I THINK?" so that you can
get something out of your head and onto paper to look at. This is called
an "idea-map." Then begin to stack your resource cards in their proper
places on the paper. Now let it sit for a while (maybe a week or two).
Put it in a safe place!
In STEP 7 find your idea-map and make sure that you still agree
with your initial reactions to the topic. Also, check to make sure that
you have adequate research information for each section. Now you begin
to write on paper (or machine). Don't pay any attention to grammar or style
yet, just get the points down in some fashion so that you can begin to
manipulate them into something readable. Write a couple of drafts by Thanksgiving
and get my feedback on your ideas. STEP 8 is polishing and refining.
The goal of your writing should be to introduce the theme clearly,
support it effectively in the body or central development, and then
draw meaningful conclusions about it. As you construct each section
of your paper, ask:
-
Does this section follow logically from the one before it?
-
Does it support and develop the central theme?
-
Does it establish the necessary background for the section that follows?
If you develop each paragraph by including transition sentences to explain
the relationship between paragraphs, then the paper becomes tightly knit
and persuasive rather than a random group of facts that do not seem to
move in any clear direction. Quotations: Don't quote too often or
too long. Unless the words of your source are unbelievably artistic, or
unless great controversy surrounds the statement, a quotation is not necessary.
In most cases a paraphrase or summary of the statement, properly footnoted,
is sufficient.
Plagiarism: "To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another
as one's own; to use a created production without crediting the source."
The only thing worse than misquoting from
your sources is plagiarizing from them. It is easy to get into the habit
of using someone else's words instead of your own, so just don't start!
First of all, I can tell the difference between the language of someone
who has spent years researching a topic and that of the average history
student. Second, and more important, is the fact that thinking is learning
-- if you think about something and then put it into your own words instead
of copying it, you have begun the rewarding task of learning. Anything
else and you're just cheating yourself out of a college course, already
bought and paid for.
Footnotes: Footnotes give the source of the facts and opinions
that appear in your paper. If you quote, paraphrase, or summarize from
your research materials, you must say where the original information can
be found. The following three types of statements should be footnoted:
-
all direct quotations
-
controversial facts or opinions that not all of your sources agree on
-
statements of fact or opinion that directly support your main points. HOWEVER,
if your resource in this case is the encyclopedia DO NOT FOOTNOTE (unless
it is a controversial issue) -- the whole purpose of an encyclopedia is
to have at hand general knowledge that most scholars agree on as
accurate to that date.
There is no such thing as the right number of footnotes, but this
critical review should not contain more than twelve to fifteen footnotes.
When you decide that a footnote is necessary, place a number at the end
of the sentence or phrase that contains the information to be documented.
Number them consecutively throughout the work and write the citations on
a separate piece of paper as you compose the rough draft. The finished
paper should have the footnotes listed on the page(s) following your text
but placed before the Bibliography page. Please use Turabian or
Chicago style format -- check with a librarian or the Writing Center to
get examples.
Bibliography: A bibliography is an alphabetical list of the resources
you used in writing your paper and should be placed at the end of your
paper. It must include all those sources that appear in footnotes, and
all those works that gave important background information. However, do
not list every source you looked at in the course of your research,
only those that influenced your final product. For example, if you used
an encyclopedia to learn general knowledge about your topic, it does not
need to be included in your bibliography. Again, use Turabian or Chicago
Style.
Now check for the following:
-
Does the paper have a strong theme and do its parts follow logically from
one to the other?
-
Is there adequate support for the major facts and interpretation?
-
Are the points of your paper made clearly and forcefully?
-
What about the mechanics of your paper, especially spelling and grammar?
typographical errors?
Read the paper aloud to a friend -- this will help you catch poor sentence
construction and awkward phrases. Take it to the Writing Center consultants.
Final Form: Leave at least an inch margin on all sides
(sometimes 1.5 inches on the left margin is preferable). Double-space the
text except for long quotations, footnotes, and bibliography which should
be single spaced. Number each page in the upper right-hand corner. Prepare
a separate title page that includes the title, your full name, the course
name and number, my name, and the date. Make a copy of your work in case
the original is lost.
Your paper will be evaluated and graded with the following checklist.
NO LATE PAPERS WILL BE ACCEPTED!
HIS104 WRITTEN PROJECT CHECKLIST
Presentation (2 points)
References: quality/type & format (4 points)
Title Describing Your Thesis (1 point)
Your Thesis & Conclusions (3 points)
Content (10 points)
- PRO (your thesis' supporting evidence)
- CON (contrary theories)
= 20 pts possible
+ 2 pts (Pass/Fail, Summary Bio Outline)
+ 3 pts (Pass/Fail, Resource Cards & Conference)
Posted May 1996; Revised June 2003
http://www.bluegrass.kctcs.edu/LCC/HIS/104